<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Pachaderm Points &#187; Uncategorized</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.steubenyr.org/category/uncategorized/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.steubenyr.org</link>
	<description>Home of the Steuben County Young Republicans.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 00:16:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>VOICELESS</title>
		<link>http://www.steubenyr.org/2010/05/voiceless/</link>
		<comments>http://www.steubenyr.org/2010/05/voiceless/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 21:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mmorrongiello</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Massa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steubenyr.org/?p=112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Congress has the Constitutional authority to levy taxes, fund all of the Federal government and declare war.  Because Congress is so powerful, the Founders wanted it to be responsive to the people.  That&#8217;s why each Congressman stands for election every two years.  President Obama&#8217;s ambitious agenda to transform America makes representation even more critical.
On March [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congress has the Constitutional authority to levy taxes, fund all of the Federal government and declare war.  Because Congress is so powerful, the Founders wanted it to be responsive to the people.  That&#8217;s why each Congressman stands for election every two years.  President Obama&#8217;s ambitious agenda to transform America makes representation even more critical.</p>
<p>On March 8th Rep. Eric Massa resigned 14 months into his first term, his personal issues having exceeded his ability to control them.  We wish Mr. Massa and his family well and thank him for his service.  But now it&#8217;s time to hold a special election and give the people of the 29th Congressional district the representation they deserve.</p>
<p>To hold a special election, Governor Patterson must declare a vacancy and then issue a proclamation; the election follows in thirty to forty days.  First, Patterson said he would &#8220;call it as soon as possible.&#8221;  Then Patterson caught a case of the slows, his office repeatedly issuing statements that &#8220;no final decision has been made yet.&#8221;  The slows must be contagious.  Democrat county chairmen were still vetting candidates when Congress passed a $2 trillion health-care overhaul.  We in the 29th district were unrepresented during this vote. </p>
<p>The county chairmen, including  Shawn Hogan and Cindy Emmer, issued this statement:  &#8220;It&#8217;s clear that a special election would prove to be very expensive, particularly considering so many counties in the 29th district are struggling financially.  Similarly, we cannot disenfranchise military voters who are currently serving overseas; we must take appropriate steps to make sure their votes are counted.  Gov. Patterson is rightfully taking these concerns into consideration and we believe he will make a decision that reflects what&#8217;s best for Southern Tier/Finger Lakes New York.&#8221;</p>
<p>In New York&#8217;s 20th district, when Kirsten Gillibrand resigned to replace Hillary Clinton in the U.S. Senate, the special election was held in 64 days.  When John McHugh resigned his seat in New York&#8217;s 23rd district, the special election was held in 43 days.  As of  May 1st, it is 54 days since Massa resigned.  If a special is called, it will be another 30 to 40 days until the election.  What are we waiting for?  If no special election is held, we&#8217;ll break the record for non-representation in New York&#8217;s 29th of 184 days, set in 1827.</p>
<p>We should all contact Gov. Patterson and demand that he call a special election.  Democrat county chairmen and elected Democrats are our friends and neighbors; ask them to support the 654,360 people of the 29th in their desire to be represented in Congress.</p>
<p>Michael A. Morrongiello</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.steubenyr.org/2010/05/voiceless/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>THE PRINCIPLED OPPOSITION</title>
		<link>http://www.steubenyr.org/2010/04/the-principled-opposition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.steubenyr.org/2010/04/the-principled-opposition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 12:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mmorrongiello</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steubenyr.org/?p=95</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conservatives oppose Obama, and we&#8217;re called ignorant and hateful.  We organize peaceful rallies against excessive government spending and we&#8217;re called &#8220;tea-baggers&#8221;, a sexual innuendo.  We oppose Obamacare and we&#8217;re branded as racist.  These despicable political tactics are designed to scare us into silence.  It won&#8217;t work.  We oppose Obama not because of race, but because [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Conservatives oppose Obama, and we&#8217;re called ignorant and hateful.  We organize peaceful rallies against excessive government spending and we&#8217;re called &#8220;tea-baggers&#8221;, a sexual innuendo.  We oppose Obamacare and we&#8217;re branded as racist.  These despicable political tactics are designed to scare us into silence.  It won&#8217;t work.  We oppose Obama not because of race, but because of his naked statism.  Conservatives proudly support three African- American candidates for the U.S. Senate and 35 African-American candidates for Congress.</p>
<p>Our dissent is rooted in the philosophy which gave rise to our founding, the Enlightenment.  John Locke, a philosopher in that movement, believed truth is found through reason and experience.  If citizens make better arguments than kings or congressmen, the citizens argument wins.  This was on display in tea parties and was seen in recent town hall meetings, where it was obvious that ordinary Americans knew more about health-care legislation than their representatives.</p>
<p>Tea partiers knew the stimulus package was futile and wasteful.  FDR tried this in the 1930&#8217;s.  It failed.  FDR&#8217;s New Deal didn&#8217;t solve the Great Depression, but prolonged it.  Unemployment averaged a painful 18% from 1933, When Roosevelt took office, to the begining of WWII.</p>
<p>Conservatives oppose Obamacare because government programs always cost far more than promised.  Massachusetts-care is similar to the bill Obama crammed through the House.  The people were promised it wouldn&#8217;t cost more than $88 million per year.  Four years after its passage, Massachusetts is broke.  Health-care costs have exceeded $4 billion.  Costs for Bay-Staters haven&#8217;t gone down; their health-care costs are the highest in the nation, 27% higher than the national average.  The Massachusetts Medical Society says there is a &#8220;critical shortage&#8221; of primary care doctors.  Bay-Staters are covered, but what good is coverage if you can&#8217;t see a doctor?</p>
<p>Fellow conservatives, fear not.  Let the liberals call us every vile name in the book.  Their attacks say far more about who they are than who we are.   Our opposition to Obama and the statist Democrats is rooted in history and experience.  Make your case fearlessly.  boldly stand on principle.  We walk in the footsteps of the founders, Jefferson, Madison and Washington.  We&#8217;re in very good company.</p>
<p>Michael A. Morrongiello</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.steubenyr.org/2010/04/the-principled-opposition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>THE FINAL COUNTDOWN</title>
		<link>http://www.steubenyr.org/2010/03/the-final-countdown/</link>
		<comments>http://www.steubenyr.org/2010/03/the-final-countdown/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 23:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mmorrongiello</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democrats]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steubenyr.org/?p=85</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama and the Democrats are poised to cram their big-government version of health-care reform down the throats of the American people. In poll after poll, a clear majority oppose Obamacare.  This doesn&#8217;t matter to Obama and the Democrats; you see, they know better.  They are on the verge of a life long Democrat dream; to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama and the Democrats are poised to cram their big-government version of health-care reform down the throats of the American people. In poll after poll, a clear majority oppose Obamacare.  This doesn&#8217;t matter to Obama and the Democrats; you see, they know better.  They are on the verge of a life long Democrat dream; to take over all of health-care. The Democrats will use any means necessary, from bribery to legislative trickery, to achieve their goal. In spite of huge majorities in the House and Senate, they can&#8217;t quite manage to push it through. This is because of the principled and common sense opposition of ordinary Americans.  The final push is rumored to be this weekend.  Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi and Obama think that the pressure of a vote will push undecided Democrats to vote yes.  House Democrats must feel more pressure from us.  To stop Obamacare we must call house members, and keep calling them.  Here are the names and numbers of local representatives.</p>
<p>Michael Arcuri   1-315-793-8146</p>
<p>Dan Maffei            1- 315-423-5657</p>
<p>Bill Owens             1-315-782-3150</p>
<p>Chris Carney        1-570-585-9988</p>
<p>Paul Kanjersky     1-570-825-2200</p>
<p>To access the names and numbers of representatives across America please go to the NRCC Code Red website <a href="http://www.nrcc.org/CodeRed/targets/">http://www.nrcc.org/CodeRed/targets/</a></p>
<p>We&#8217;ve all done great work so far.  Let&#8217;s keep up the pressure and defeat this grotesque monstrosity that is Obamacare.</p>
<p>Michael A. Morrongiello</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.steubenyr.org/2010/03/the-final-countdown/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Commander Has No Clothes</title>
		<link>http://www.steubenyr.org/2010/02/the-commander-has-no-clothes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.steubenyr.org/2010/02/the-commander-has-no-clothes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 19:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steubenyr.org/?p=55</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Military service is no guarantee of competence, or of standing on the right side of history.  General George B. McClellan, appointed by Abraham Lincoln to head the Union Army, obstructed the President at every turn.  McClellan then ran against Lincoln as the Democrat party nominee in 1864. Had he won, the Confederacy would [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Military service is no guarantee of competence, or of standing on the right side of history.  General George B. McClellan, appointed by Abraham Lincoln to head the Union Army, obstructed the President at every turn.  McClellan then ran against Lincoln as the Democrat party nominee in 1864. Had he won, the Confederacy would have remained in place with slavery intact.  President Carter, a Naval Academy graduate, gutted our military, weakened us abroad and saddled us with double-digit inflation and interest rates at home.</p>
<p>Enter Rep. Eric Massa, who features his commendable military service at every opportunity.  This provides him with a veneer of moderation to obscure his liberalism.  If he were an ex-ACLU lawyer insead of an ex-Navy man, Massa&#8217;s leftism would be more apparent.</p>
<p>Consider Massa&#8217;s position on health care.  He opposed HR 3962, which was a government takeover of private insurance companies.  But he supports HR 686, a government run single-payer plan.  In a single-payer system, you pay for everybody&#8217;s health care and they pay for yours.  This is as collectivist as you can get.  Massa said, &#8220;I support the idea of a single-payer health care system in which the doctor-patient relationship remains personal and private, but costs are centrally managed.&#8221;  These are the ideas of central-planning socialists.  This country was founded on the polar opposite &#8211; principles of individual freedom and free markets.  Single-payer is not working out well in Canada.  They have 8 life-saving MRI&#8217;s per million people, to our 27.  If you need an MRI in Canada, wait in line.  The Premier of Newfoundland, Danny Williams, recently bypassed the Canadian system to have heart surgery in the U.S.</p>
<p>Massa occupies the far left in a leftist party.  We judge our leaders by their results.  In Massa&#8217;s case, the evidence is damning.  Despite all the historic evidence that government stimulus doesn&#8217;t work, he voted for it anyway, stimulating nothing but debt and unemployment.  He markets himself as an independent thinker, yet his policies foster dependency.  It&#8217;s time we see Massa clearly: a liberal in moderate&#8217;s clothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.steubenyr.org/2010/02/the-commander-has-no-clothes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who is Our Congressman&#8217;s Real Constituents?</title>
		<link>http://www.steubenyr.org/2010/02/who-is-our-congressmans-real-constituents/</link>
		<comments>http://www.steubenyr.org/2010/02/who-is-our-congressmans-real-constituents/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 12:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steubenyr.org/?p=54</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You may have missed some of these stories in the news.  That&#8217;s because our local news hasn&#8217;t covered them.  Several events recently have lead us to question who Eric Massa&#8217;s real constituents are.

December 19th Eric Massa was just getting out of Washington DC for Christmas break.  He couldn&#8217;t break quite yet, because [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may have missed some of these stories in the news.  That&#8217;s because our local news hasn&#8217;t covered them.  Several events recently have lead us to question who Eric Massa&#8217;s real constituents are.
<div></div>
<div>December 19th Eric Massa was just getting out of Washington DC for Christmas break.  He couldn&#8217;t break quite yet, because work was still on his mind.  The Congressman had to continue his fight for Single Payer healthcare.  Where was he doing this fight?  Corning? Olean?  Rochester?  No, <a href="http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2009/12/19/18633170.php">San Francisco, California</a>.  Well you know, because there are so many constituents there.  While there he talked about picking up Ted Kennedy&#8217;s mantle with the government run healthcare debate.</div>
<div></div>
<div>January 4th our Congressman turned his focus on the Marcellus shale.  Even though other states like Pennsylvania have developed reasonable safeguards and started developing this vital resource, Massa would prefer to stop this development.  Where did this debate take place?  <a href="http://www.prleap.com/pr/145846/">New York City</a>.  No constituents there?  You&#8217;re right.</div>
<div></div>
<div>Lastly, the infamous Netroots Nation.  You&#8217;ve certainly seen the video where he talks about voting &#8220;<a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/weblogs/watercooler/2009/aug/16/video-rep-massa-i-will-vote-against-interests-my-d/">against the interests of his district</a>.&#8221; What you may not have asked yourself is where did this occur?  It was held in Pittsburg, PA.  He was speaking to people indicating how he resides in a &#8220;right-wing&#8221; district and he indicated he might need their help.  Netroots Nation was a conference of progressive bloggers that represent the most extreme parts of the Democrat Party.  </div>
<div></div>
<div>So, the question is if he insists on not representing our interests, if he insists on focusing so much of his most controversial talk for outside of his district, why is that?  It&#8217;s because his views are not as popular here.  He thinks you all want Government run healthcare.  He thinks you want to stop Marcellus Shale drilling.  He thinks you&#8217;ll let him continue voting without being concerned about what you think.</div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.steubenyr.org/2010/02/who-is-our-congressmans-real-constituents/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Massa: Questionable Associates and Fringe Views</title>
		<link>http://www.steubenyr.org/2010/01/massa-questionable-associates-and-fringe-views/</link>
		<comments>http://www.steubenyr.org/2010/01/massa-questionable-associates-and-fringe-views/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 18:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steubenyr.org/?p=53</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Joe Dunning puts out a column in the Corning Leader newspaper every Sunday that is usually political in nature.  The editor has made no bones about the fact that he is a Democrat.  However, he certainly has kept an open mind in the past (which this writer hopes that he does in the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe Dunning puts out a column in the Corning Leader newspaper every Sunday that is usually political in nature.  The editor has made no bones about the fact that he is a Democrat.  However, he certainly has kept an open mind in the past (which this writer hopes that he does in the NY-29 race).  This made it quite a surprise as to the seeming anger that was expressed in his Jan. 31st, 2010 column.  His response makes me wonder if the Editor is as unbiased as he appears.  Why else would Mr. Dunning go ballistic about a press release that clearly wasn&#8217;t <a href="http://www.tomreedforcongress.com/2010/01/26/massa-cosponsors-end-of-war-resolution/">calling Massa a Communist</a>.
<div></div>
<div>The truth is, Congressman Massa&#8217;s associations and who agrees with him does tell us a lot about what kind of man he is.  First, let&#8217;s take health care.  The Congressman has made a big display of parading around the district and in front of the media saying that he won&#8217;t vote for the health care bill.  That&#8217;s because he&#8217;s for s<a href="http://massa.house.gov/index.cfm?sectionid=24&amp;parentid=23&amp;sectiontree=23,24&amp;itemid=138">ingle payer healthcare</a> (socialized medicine, government run healthcare, medicare for all, etc).  This position is even <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/46417/what-happened-to-single-payer">farther to the left than even President Obama</a> wants to go.</div>
<div></div>
<div>Secondly, his position on Afghanistan.  The Congressman has called for an immediate withdrawal from Afghanistan.  Let&#8217;s not try to capture Bin Laden.  Who cares about the instability of the country or the area?  This position also is even more <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g3dH3F4HzyM&amp;NR=1">radical than the President believes</a>.</div>
<div></div>
<div>Lastly, his associations in fundraising and in the Congress.  He has received help from Charlie Rangel and Barney Frank with fundraising at an event that was <a href="http://politicalpartytime.org/party/16222/">billed as a birthday party</a>, with an entry fee much richer than any of our birthday parties.  <a href="http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/editorials/item_TOrXOU2HLuRTqCn7vCUgfN">Mr. Rangel</a> and <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/local/longterm/tours/scandal/gobie2.htm">Mr. Frank</a> are two of the most corrupt members of Congress.</div>
<div></div>
<div>So that brings us back to the Communist comment.  It&#8217;s not that Mr. Massa is a Communist.  He may hold some socialistic viewpoints, but I don&#8217;t think that you could call him a Communist nor was that any reasonable reading of the press release. The question really is one of associations.  What does it mean when people like Mr. Rangel, Mr. Frank, and the Communist Party endorse you?  I can tell you what it CLEARLY doesn&#8217;t mean.  It doesn&#8217;t mean your views are a part of the mainstream.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.steubenyr.org/2010/01/massa-questionable-associates-and-fringe-views/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nobody Shoots Santa Claus</title>
		<link>http://www.steubenyr.org/2010/01/nobody-shoots-santa-claus/</link>
		<comments>http://www.steubenyr.org/2010/01/nobody-shoots-santa-claus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 19:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steubenyr.org/?p=51</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Franklin Delano Roosevelt (FDR) was elected in 1932 to solve America&#8217;s greatest economic crisis, the Great Depression.  In his first year he increased federal spending 83% and federal debt 73%.  Roosevelt created new federal agencies: the Civil Works Administration, the Works Progress Administration, the National Recovery Administration.  By 1934, unemployment was 22% [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Franklin Delano Roosevelt (FDR) was elected in 1932 to solve America&#8217;s greatest economic crisis, the Great Depression.  In his first year he increased federal spending 83% and federal debt 73%.  Roosevelt created new federal agencies: the Civil Works Administration, the Works Progress Administration, the National Recovery Administration.  By 1934, <a href="http://www.shmoop.com/great-depression/timeline.html">unemployment was 22%</a> and the stock market languished at just 25% of its pre-crash value.  The party in power usually loses seats in mid-term elections; in 1934, Democrat prospects looked bleak.  Yet they gained seats.  How did Roosevelt and the Democrats do it?
<div>When your economic program fails, resort to politics.  Roosevelt spent New Deal money where it helped Democrats most.  Maine was strongly Republican but held its elections in September, not November; it was used as a test case.  <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=HwTPk00QMHIC&amp;pg=PT187&amp;lpg=PT187&amp;dq=%22Maine+has+received+%24108+million+from+New+Deal+agencies.%22&amp;source=bl&amp;ots=5vzXLIaefL&amp;sig=5IQHVw5tl4OiAnGTtraMZROfYZ4&amp;hl=en&amp;ei=OSlLS_OVB4OnlAf_15SKDQ&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=book_result&amp;ct=result&amp;resnum=1&amp;ved=0CAcQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&amp;q=%22Maine%20has%20received%20%24108%20million%20from%20New%20Deal%20agencies.%22&amp;f=false">One Democrat Congressman bragged that</a> &#8220;Maine has received $108 million from New Deal agencies.&#8221;  Naval contracts flowed to Bath, Maine, while Eastport received funds for a new seawall and a bridge rebuild.  In the 1934 mid-term elections, Democrats captured two of three House seats in Maine, and nationally swept to historic victories.  The Great Depression dragged on for another six years.</div>
<div>This is relevant today.  The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, AKA the &#8220;stimulus,&#8221; is an $819 billion spending package that&#8217;s supposed to revive the economy.  The major spending is scheduled for 2010 through 2012, targeted for maximum political effect, just like the New Deal projects.</div>
<div>Government stimulus programs don&#8217;t work.  Roosevelt&#8217;s Treasury Secretary, Henry Morgenthau, Jr., told Congress in 1939:  &#8220;I say after eight years of this administration we have just as much unemployment as when we started, and we have enormous debt to boot.&#8221;  In 1940, unemployment still topped 18%.  Japan tried this in the 1990&#8217;s.  They spent lavishly on infrastructure, piling up mountains of debt.  Their economy didn&#8217;t improve; the Japanese now call the 1990&#8217;s &#8220;the lost decade.&#8221;  In 2008 the U.S. ran a budget deficit of $459 billion, or 3.2% of GDP, and still the recession accelerated.  The 2009 projected deficit is $1.4 trillion, or 13% of GDP.  When government spends, it must raise taxes or borrow, crowding out private sector investment and stifling job creation.</div>
<div>Expect Democrates to promote stimulus projects.  Former <a href="http://thinkexist.com/quotation/no_sane_local_official_who_has_hung_up_an_empty/346136.html">Governor Al Smith said</a> of Roosevelt&#8217;s spending, &#8220;Nobody shoots Santa Claus.&#8221;  He was right in one respect: people love free money.  But it&#8217;s our money.  Politicians give back what they&#8217;ve taken from us, pretending it&#8217;s a gift.  Obama and his accomplices are turning the U.S. economy into a shovel-ready project.  It&#8217;s going to take years to dig out.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.steubenyr.org/2010/01/nobody-shoots-santa-claus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>REPUBLICAN PARTY, GO BACK TO THE FUTURE</title>
		<link>http://www.steubenyr.org/2009/12/republican-party-go-back-to-the-future/</link>
		<comments>http://www.steubenyr.org/2009/12/republican-party-go-back-to-the-future/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 12:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steubenyr.org/?p=50</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In 1854, patriots founded the Republican Party to advance freedom and end the ability of one person to own another, or lay claim to his labor.  They believed that we are free to work hard, profit from our efforts and rise as high as our talent takes us.  Each of us is unique, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 1854, patriots founded the Republican Party to advance freedom and end the ability of one person to own another, or lay claim to his labor.  They believed that we are free to work hard, profit from our efforts and rise as high as our talent takes us.  Each of us is unique, has value and is born free.  These ideas are timeless.  They are enshrined in the Declaration of Independence, codified in our Constitution and validated by the broad sweep of history.  Abraham Lincoln believed this and lived it.  He was born poor and was illiterate.  He taught himself to read and write, became a successful lawyer and our greatest president.  But these ideas are now under assault.  In the 19th century, freedom&#8217;s challenge was slavery; in the 21st century, it is servitude.  Will the Republican Party be true to the heritage of Lincoln and Reagan?  Will it rise to meet freedom&#8217;s challenge?</p>
<p>   The Democrat Party, as in the mid-19th century, is a ruling elite, leeching the work of others.  The most frequent visitor to the Obama White House is Andy Stern, president of the Service Employees International Union (SEIU).  Public sector union members now make up 51% of all union membership.  As the ranks of bureaucrats swell, Democrats reap cash and votes from grateful union members.  It is not in their interest to meet freedom&#8217;s challenge.  Congress has spent freely for years.  Now, Democrats are spending wildly.  Their spending will crush us, reducing our standard of living and that of our children.  Here are the trends.</p>
<p>   As of 2004, the average federal employee earned $100,178 compared to the average private sector employee, who earned $51,876.  Between 1990 and 2004, federal employee compensation exploded 115%, versus private sector compensation&#8217;s growth of 69%.  At the state and local level, government employees grew from 13.9 million to 15.7 million as of 2004.  We are now in servitude to the government that is supposed to serve us.  Sadly, Republicans were in charge of the federal government during much of that time.  They betrayed the principles of their party, lost the confidence of the people and were thrashed in two elections.</p>
<p>   We&#8217;ve been here before, and always for the same reasons.  In the 1930&#8217;s President Hoover tried to tinker and spend his way out of the Great Depression.  President Bush spent freely, added entitlements and extended federal control of education.  Each time, in the ensuing elections Democrats seized control.  They are now poised to scrap freedom, control our lives and shackle us in permanent servitude.</p>
<p>   There is reason to hope.  An answer to freedom&#8217;s challenge and a road map to victory exists, and it works.  In Ronald Reagan&#8217;s speech entitled &#8220;Let them go their way,&#8221; he said, &#8220;I do not believe I have proposed anything that is contrary to what has been considered Republican principle.  It is, at the same time, the very basis of conservativism.  It is time to reassert that principle and raise it to full view.&#8221;  Let the raising begin.  Here are some proposals to reverse the free-fall to servitude.</p>
<p>ONE.  Local activism is critical.  Stay informed.  Use the internet.  Write letters to the editor and columns for the newspaper.  Run for local office &#8211; city council, school board, etc.</p>
<p>TWO.  Congress disregards the Constitution with willful contempt.  We must pass the Enumerated Powers Act, which requires legislators to cite the Constitutional authority to enact what they propose.  This will force Congress to reconnect with the document that gives them the authority to govern.  It will only pass if Congress is hearing from the American people &#8211; call and write your legislators.</p>
<p>THREE.  We must support charter schools, school choice and home schooling.  Parents pay for public education.  They should be treated like customers.  Their money should follow their children to the schools of their choice.</p>
<p>FOUR.  Support a flat tax or a national sales tax.  The current tax code punishes hard work.  It is a magnet for special interest abuse and social engineering.  It&#8217;s incomprehensible,sapping billions of dollars from the economy in compliance costs.</p>
<p>FIVE.  Free market principles should be applied to health care reform.  It should be consumer-centered.  Expanding Health Savings Accounts is one way to accomplish this.</p>
<p>   Ronald Reagan said, &#8220;Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction&#8230; it must be fought for, protected and handed on to {the next generation} to do the same.&#8221;  If the Republican Party returns to its roots, it will restore itself and save the country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.steubenyr.org/2009/12/republican-party-go-back-to-the-future/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Massa&#8217;s Ridiculous Solution to Bank Crisis</title>
		<link>http://www.steubenyr.org/2009/12/massas-ridiculous-solution-to-bank-crisis/</link>
		<comments>http://www.steubenyr.org/2009/12/massas-ridiculous-solution-to-bank-crisis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 04:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steubenyr.org/?p=49</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last Year, the collapse of the banking caught some off guard.  It certainly did to Barney Frank, who testified that there was no problem.  Congressman Frank&#8217;s &#8220;spouse&#8221; is the Herb Moses who is in charge of Fannie Mae.  He was encouraging people to invest while Rome burned.  By the way, Barney [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last Year, the collapse of the banking caught some off guard.  It certainly did to Barney Frank, who testified that there was no problem.  Congressman Frank&#8217;s &#8220;spouse&#8221; is the Herb Moses who is in charge of Fannie Mae.  He was encouraging people to <a href="http://www.usnews.com/blogs/sam-dealey/2008/09/10/barney-franks-fannie-and-freddie-muddle.html">invest while Rome burned</a>.  By the way, Barney Frank is pretty close to Representative Eric Massa.  He has given him a pretty hefty sum of money <a href="http://query.nictusa.com/cgi-bin/com_rcvd/C00411306/">($5000 total so far)</a> and has thrown a <a href="http://politicalpartytime.org/party/16222/">pretty big fundraiser as well</a>.</p>
<p><object height="344" width="425"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/4Dg4Vmy_5F4&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/4Dg4Vmy_5F4&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" height="344" width="425"></embed></object></p>
<p>However, we are here because of Congressman Massa&#8217;s foolish comments about the solution to the banking collapse.  He indicates in his announcement speech that if we had unionized Wall Street the collapse would not have happened.  Seriously?!</p>
<p>So was there any questions on exactly how to perform this unionization of Wall Street.  Or maybe how such a unionization would have stopped people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.steubenyr.org/2009/12/massas-ridiculous-solution-to-bank-crisis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rep. Massa: on Unions</title>
		<link>http://www.steubenyr.org/2009/11/rep-massa-on-unions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.steubenyr.org/2009/11/rep-massa-on-unions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steubenyr.org/?p=48</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At the announcement of Congressman Eric Massa, one of the Young Republicans was there to hear what the Congressman had to say.  We&#8217;ve posted one video so far on a quote that he had to say about the stimulus.  We feel that he&#8217;s proved in the past that he&#8217;s way off the mark [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the announcement of Congressman Eric Massa, one of the Young Republicans was there to hear what the Congressman had to say.  We&#8217;ve posted one video so far on a quote that he had to say <a href="http://blog.steubenyr.com/2009/10/rep-massa-on-stimulus-money.html">about the stimulus</a>.  We feel that he&#8217;s proved in the past that he&#8217;s <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/weblogs/watercooler/2009/aug/16/video-rep-massa-i-will-vote-against-interests-my-d/">way off the mark on many of his comments</a>.
<div>
<div>
<div><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/eYG-SOExfD4&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/eYG-SOExfD4&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></div>
<p></div>
<div>This next one really is more controversial, because of the nature of unions.  Especially as Card Check (like many of the bills this year) is shoved through.  It&#8217;s not that unions themselves are always bad.  They certain started as a good thing. However, we take issue with the Congressman on two major points.</div>
<div></div>
<div>First, Massa&#8217;s tainted by the unions because they <a href="http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/pacs.php?cycle=2010&amp;cid=N00027550&amp;type=I">give him so much money</a>.  There are thousands of dollars that have poured into his campaign from union PACs.  And this is where the Congressman is a hypocrite.  He criticized his opponent last time Rep. John &#8220;Randy&#8221; Kuhl, Jr. for taking corporate PACs, and he was taking PAC money too, but from Unions.  Now Rep. Massa is taking both.</div>
<div></div>
<div>Second, the biggest issue is that Rep. Massa claims that <b>if you disagree with him that you are not American</b>.  This obviously is ridiculous.  We aren&#8217;t going to agree on things and that isn&#8217;t a bad thing.  One of the most important parts of our Democracy is a healthy debate on the issues.  Eric Massa wants us to just take his word for it.</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.steubenyr.org/2009/11/rep-massa-on-unions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
