<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Pachaderm Points</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.steubenyr.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.steubenyr.org</link>
	<description>Home of the Steuben County Young Republicans.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 20:59:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>PROMISES, PROMISES</title>
		<link>http://www.steubenyr.org/2010/07/promises-promises/</link>
		<comments>http://www.steubenyr.org/2010/07/promises-promises/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 20:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mmorrongiello</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democrats]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steubenyr.org/?p=120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Making promises is easy for Presidents.  Delivering on them is another matter.  Presidents Kennedy and Johnson, for example, pledged to end poverty by declaring war on it.  The selling point of the &#8220;War on Poverty&#8221; was that massive up-front investments would end dependency and poverty.  Kennedy said, &#8220;We must find ways of returning far more [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Making promises is easy for Presidents.  Delivering on them is another matter.  Presidents Kennedy and Johnson, for example, pledged to end poverty by declaring war on it.  The selling point of the &#8220;War on Poverty&#8221; was that massive up-front investments would end dependency and poverty.  Kennedy said, &#8220;We must find ways of returning far more dependent people to independence.&#8221;  Johnson wanted to &#8220;break the cycle of poverty&#8221; and &#8220;make taxpayers out of tax-eaters.&#8221;  A New York Times editorial of the day said, &#8220;The initial cost will actually be greater than the mere continuation of handouts.  The dividends will come in the restoration of individual dignity and in the long-run reduction of the need for government help.&#8221;  Since the passage of Johnson&#8217;s Great Society programs, we&#8217;ve spent $5.1 trillion in the war on poverty.  That&#8217;s right, five trillion dollars.  Many of the programs which were supposed to be temporary are now permanent and ever-growing fixtures in the Federal budget.  And poverty rates have not changed at all.</p>
<p>Now, on to the promises that President Obama and Congressional Democrats made to get sweeping health care reform passed.  First, Obama said we could keep our health insurance: &#8220;If you like your plan, you can keep it.&#8221;  In a recent Friday night document dump, an internal administration paper revealed that  87 million Americans will lose their current plans.  The number could be as high as 117 million.  The document is a collaboration of Health and Human Services (HHS,) Internal Revenue and the Department of Labor.  How is this possible?  HHS has the authority to revoke the &#8220;grandfathered&#8221; status of existing health plans, if the employer makes a change in the plan.  According to regulations already in place, 51% of existing employer-based plans will lose &#8220;grandfathered&#8221; status by 2013.</p>
<p>Obama and the Democrats also promised that health care &#8220;reform&#8221; would reduce the deficit.  To sell the program to us, they had to get the total cost under one trillion dollars.  The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) is the agency that gives the final word on program costs, although their estimate is only as accurate as the numbers given to them.  The original CBO estimate was a $940 billion cost from 2010 to 2019, reducing the budget deficit by $138 billion.  Sounds good, right?  But it&#8217;s not true.  Here&#8217;s how they made it look like less than a trillion: collect taxes up front starting in 2011, build up a surplus of these taxes, and don&#8217;t begin paying benefits until 2014.  Presto, you have &#8220;deficit reduction.&#8221;  But wait &#8211; there&#8217;s more.  They counted Medicare cuts twice, omitted payment rate increases (known as the &#8220;doc fix,&#8221;) and indexed benefits to the general inflation rates rather than medical inflation.  The real estimate of what the health care bill will cost:  as much as $2.5 trillion.</p>
<p>Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi said, &#8220;We have to pass the bill to find out what is in it.&#8221;  We are finding out every day, and it isn&#8217;t what was promised.  As many as 33 states are mounting legal or legislative challenges to the bill.  With polls showing that many Americans want the bill repealed, Rep. Louise Slaughter, Democrat of New York, said &#8220;It&#8217;s just like trying to explain the Encyclopedia Britannica&#8230;&#8221; translation:  the public is too dumb to understand the bill.  We do understand it, and we understand that we have been lied to.</p>
<p>Michael A. Morrongiello</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.steubenyr.org/2010/07/promises-promises/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>VOICELESS</title>
		<link>http://www.steubenyr.org/2010/05/voiceless/</link>
		<comments>http://www.steubenyr.org/2010/05/voiceless/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 21:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mmorrongiello</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Massa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steubenyr.org/?p=112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Congress has the Constitutional authority to levy taxes, fund all of the Federal government and declare war.  Because Congress is so powerful, the Founders wanted it to be responsive to the people.  That&#8217;s why each Congressman stands for election every two years.  President Obama&#8217;s ambitious agenda to transform America makes representation even more critical.
On March [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congress has the Constitutional authority to levy taxes, fund all of the Federal government and declare war.  Because Congress is so powerful, the Founders wanted it to be responsive to the people.  That&#8217;s why each Congressman stands for election every two years.  President Obama&#8217;s ambitious agenda to transform America makes representation even more critical.</p>
<p>On March 8th Rep. Eric Massa resigned 14 months into his first term, his personal issues having exceeded his ability to control them.  We wish Mr. Massa and his family well and thank him for his service.  But now it&#8217;s time to hold a special election and give the people of the 29th Congressional district the representation they deserve.</p>
<p>To hold a special election, Governor Patterson must declare a vacancy and then issue a proclamation; the election follows in thirty to forty days.  First, Patterson said he would &#8220;call it as soon as possible.&#8221;  Then Patterson caught a case of the slows, his office repeatedly issuing statements that &#8220;no final decision has been made yet.&#8221;  The slows must be contagious.  Democrat county chairmen were still vetting candidates when Congress passed a $2 trillion health-care overhaul.  We in the 29th district were unrepresented during this vote. </p>
<p>The county chairmen, including  Shawn Hogan and Cindy Emmer, issued this statement:  &#8220;It&#8217;s clear that a special election would prove to be very expensive, particularly considering so many counties in the 29th district are struggling financially.  Similarly, we cannot disenfranchise military voters who are currently serving overseas; we must take appropriate steps to make sure their votes are counted.  Gov. Patterson is rightfully taking these concerns into consideration and we believe he will make a decision that reflects what&#8217;s best for Southern Tier/Finger Lakes New York.&#8221;</p>
<p>In New York&#8217;s 20th district, when Kirsten Gillibrand resigned to replace Hillary Clinton in the U.S. Senate, the special election was held in 64 days.  When John McHugh resigned his seat in New York&#8217;s 23rd district, the special election was held in 43 days.  As of  May 1st, it is 54 days since Massa resigned.  If a special is called, it will be another 30 to 40 days until the election.  What are we waiting for?  If no special election is held, we&#8217;ll break the record for non-representation in New York&#8217;s 29th of 184 days, set in 1827.</p>
<p>We should all contact Gov. Patterson and demand that he call a special election.  Democrat county chairmen and elected Democrats are our friends and neighbors; ask them to support the 654,360 people of the 29th in their desire to be represented in Congress.</p>
<p>Michael A. Morrongiello</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.steubenyr.org/2010/05/voiceless/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Unprincipled Opposition</title>
		<link>http://www.steubenyr.org/2010/04/the-unprincipled-opposition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.steubenyr.org/2010/04/the-unprincipled-opposition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 16:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mmorrongiello</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steubenyr.org/?p=103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conservatives are called stupid, ignorant, racist and worse.  Recently, I ran smack into this at a three-day forensic psychology conference.  The presenters were highly educated professionals, leaders in their field.  The first presenter said Pennsylvania was Philadelphia and Pittsburgh, with nothing else in between.  The second day, a different presenter stated that &#8220;Southern racist Democrats who opposed civil [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Conservatives are called stupid, ignorant, racist and worse.  Recently, I ran smack into this at a three-day forensic psychology conference.  The presenters were highly educated professionals, leaders in their field.  The first presenter said Pennsylvania was Philadelphia and Pittsburgh, with nothing else in between.  The second day, a different presenter stated that &#8220;Southern racist Democrats who opposed civil rights are Republicans now.&#8221;  The last presenter, Dr. X, referenced Sarah Palin as &#8220;the idiot who wrote her speech on her hand.&#8221;  He described a jury in Binghamton, NY as &#8220;arriving in pickup trucks, gun racks in the back, dressed like American Gothic.&#8221;  Finally, he asserted that no one got death threats before the Tea Parties.</p>
<p>The message was clear.  Rural people are ignorant at best, stupid at worst and always bigots.  Republicans and conservatives are all three.  The tone was contemptuous, the attacks disdainful and personal.</p>
<p>On the last day I stood up and stated, &#8220;I drive a pickup truck, I sometimes have guns in the back, I helped organize a tea party and, by the way, my wife is from Binghamton.&#8221;  I asked for simple respect and, quoting Lincoln, asked the presenters and attendees to access &#8220;the better angels of their nature.&#8221;  Dr. X refused to apologize.  After the session, several colleagues approached me, were complimentary and glad I spoke up.  One, who happened to be African-American, said &#8220;Thanks, man, I&#8217;m a Republican.&#8221;</p>
<p>As we were leaving the hotel the next morning my wife Jo, who is an American beauty, not American Gothic, introduced herself to Dr. X as &#8220;the idiot from Binghamton&#8221; and attempted to educate him about stereotypes.  He was cordial but remained unapologetic.</p>
<p>What gives rise to the contempt of the arrogant?  They believe they&#8217;re intellectually and morally superior.  It&#8217;s a step down a dangerous path of dehumanization.</p>
<p>We conservatives need to speak up.  In doing so, we give like-minded people the courage to find their voices as well.  Expect emotion-driven, personal attacks.  Expect to feel angry and/or insulted; it&#8217;s only natural.  Remember that the attacks are rooted in arrogance and contempt.  Take several deep breaths, in through the nose and out through the mouth, slowly.  Respond factually.  Smile - it helps reduce tension.  As Churchill said, &#8220;Attitude is a little thing that makes a big difference.&#8221;  Don&#8217;t be intimidated.  They&#8217;re not very scary.  If this is the best the high-powered brains I endured for three days can come up with, we have nothing to fear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.steubenyr.org/2010/04/the-unprincipled-opposition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>THE PRINCIPLED OPPOSITION</title>
		<link>http://www.steubenyr.org/2010/04/the-principled-opposition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.steubenyr.org/2010/04/the-principled-opposition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 12:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mmorrongiello</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steubenyr.org/?p=95</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conservatives oppose Obama, and we&#8217;re called ignorant and hateful.  We organize peaceful rallies against excessive government spending and we&#8217;re called &#8220;tea-baggers&#8221;, a sexual innuendo.  We oppose Obamacare and we&#8217;re branded as racist.  These despicable political tactics are designed to scare us into silence.  It won&#8217;t work.  We oppose Obama not because of race, but because [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Conservatives oppose Obama, and we&#8217;re called ignorant and hateful.  We organize peaceful rallies against excessive government spending and we&#8217;re called &#8220;tea-baggers&#8221;, a sexual innuendo.  We oppose Obamacare and we&#8217;re branded as racist.  These despicable political tactics are designed to scare us into silence.  It won&#8217;t work.  We oppose Obama not because of race, but because of his naked statism.  Conservatives proudly support three African- American candidates for the U.S. Senate and 35 African-American candidates for Congress.</p>
<p>Our dissent is rooted in the philosophy which gave rise to our founding, the Enlightenment.  John Locke, a philosopher in that movement, believed truth is found through reason and experience.  If citizens make better arguments than kings or congressmen, the citizens argument wins.  This was on display in tea parties and was seen in recent town hall meetings, where it was obvious that ordinary Americans knew more about health-care legislation than their representatives.</p>
<p>Tea partiers knew the stimulus package was futile and wasteful.  FDR tried this in the 1930&#8217;s.  It failed.  FDR&#8217;s New Deal didn&#8217;t solve the Great Depression, but prolonged it.  Unemployment averaged a painful 18% from 1933, When Roosevelt took office, to the begining of WWII.</p>
<p>Conservatives oppose Obamacare because government programs always cost far more than promised.  Massachusetts-care is similar to the bill Obama crammed through the House.  The people were promised it wouldn&#8217;t cost more than $88 million per year.  Four years after its passage, Massachusetts is broke.  Health-care costs have exceeded $4 billion.  Costs for Bay-Staters haven&#8217;t gone down; their health-care costs are the highest in the nation, 27% higher than the national average.  The Massachusetts Medical Society says there is a &#8220;critical shortage&#8221; of primary care doctors.  Bay-Staters are covered, but what good is coverage if you can&#8217;t see a doctor?</p>
<p>Fellow conservatives, fear not.  Let the liberals call us every vile name in the book.  Their attacks say far more about who they are than who we are.   Our opposition to Obama and the statist Democrats is rooted in history and experience.  Make your case fearlessly.  boldly stand on principle.  We walk in the footsteps of the founders, Jefferson, Madison and Washington.  We&#8217;re in very good company.</p>
<p>Michael A. Morrongiello</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.steubenyr.org/2010/04/the-principled-opposition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>THE FINAL COUNTDOWN</title>
		<link>http://www.steubenyr.org/2010/03/the-final-countdown/</link>
		<comments>http://www.steubenyr.org/2010/03/the-final-countdown/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 23:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mmorrongiello</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democrats]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steubenyr.org/?p=85</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama and the Democrats are poised to cram their big-government version of health-care reform down the throats of the American people. In poll after poll, a clear majority oppose Obamacare.  This doesn&#8217;t matter to Obama and the Democrats; you see, they know better.  They are on the verge of a life long Democrat dream; to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama and the Democrats are poised to cram their big-government version of health-care reform down the throats of the American people. In poll after poll, a clear majority oppose Obamacare.  This doesn&#8217;t matter to Obama and the Democrats; you see, they know better.  They are on the verge of a life long Democrat dream; to take over all of health-care. The Democrats will use any means necessary, from bribery to legislative trickery, to achieve their goal. In spite of huge majorities in the House and Senate, they can&#8217;t quite manage to push it through. This is because of the principled and common sense opposition of ordinary Americans.  The final push is rumored to be this weekend.  Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi and Obama think that the pressure of a vote will push undecided Democrats to vote yes.  House Democrats must feel more pressure from us.  To stop Obamacare we must call house members, and keep calling them.  Here are the names and numbers of local representatives.</p>
<p>Michael Arcuri   1-315-793-8146</p>
<p>Dan Maffei            1- 315-423-5657</p>
<p>Bill Owens             1-315-782-3150</p>
<p>Chris Carney        1-570-585-9988</p>
<p>Paul Kanjersky     1-570-825-2200</p>
<p>To access the names and numbers of representatives across America please go to the NRCC Code Red website <a href="http://www.nrcc.org/CodeRed/targets/">http://www.nrcc.org/CodeRed/targets/</a></p>
<p>We&#8217;ve all done great work so far.  Let&#8217;s keep up the pressure and defeat this grotesque monstrosity that is Obamacare.</p>
<p>Michael A. Morrongiello</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.steubenyr.org/2010/03/the-final-countdown/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Just Consent</title>
		<link>http://www.steubenyr.org/2010/03/just-consent/</link>
		<comments>http://www.steubenyr.org/2010/03/just-consent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 23:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mmorrongiello</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steubenyr.org/?p=81</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The health-care debate is over.  Obama and the Democrats lost.  The American people said &#8220;no&#8221; to Obamacare from the Tea Parties to town hall meetings.  The people said &#8220;no&#8221; by electing Republican governors in Virginia and heavily Democrat New Jersey.  The people said &#8220;hell, no&#8221; by electing a Republican, Scott Brown, to fill the seat [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The health-care debate is over.  Obama and the Democrats lost.  The American people said &#8220;no&#8221; to Obamacare from the Tea Parties to town hall meetings.  The people said &#8220;no&#8221; by electing Republican governors in Virginia and heavily Democrat New Jersey.  The people said &#8220;hell, no&#8221; by electing a Republican, Scott Brown, to fill the seat of the champion of socialized medicine, Teddy Kennedy.  In poll after poll, a majority of Americans oppose the House and Senate health-care bills.  In spite of this, Democrats are planning to ram Obamacare through the Senate using a procedure called Budget Reconciliation.</p>
<p>The Declaration of Independence states: &#8220;&#8230;to secure these rights governments are instituted among men, deriving their powers from the just consent of the governed.&#8221;  These rights are the natural rights we&#8217;re born with.  We all start with the same rights, so none of us is superior, not senator, congressman or president.  We the people temporarily surrender power to our leaders to run the government, but the people are sovereign and the ultimate rulers of our country.  Therefore, our elected leaders must have our just consent, or permission, to pass laws affecting all of us.  They must follow the rules of governance, just as we must follow rules in our everyday lives.  It&#8217;s critical to the survival of our republic.  The Democrats are plotting to break the rules in the Senate, and they will use reconciliation to do it.</p>
<p>The Senate, unlike the House, requires 60 votes, known as a super majority, to pass legislation.  Reconciliation was designed for budgetary items.  A reconciliation bill needs only 51 votes to pass, a simple majority.  Using reconciliation to pass major legislation is a reckless power-grab.  Reconciliation wasn&#8217;t intended for legislation affecting 300 million Americans and fully one-sixth of our economy.  The Founders designed the Senate as a check to the more passion-prone House, saying &#8220;We pour legislation into the Senatorial saucer to cool it.&#8221;  This was designed to create deliberation and thoughtfulness.  In the words of Benjamin Franklin,&#8221;Passion governs, and she never governs wisely.&#8221; </p>
<p>If the Democrat health-care bills were popular, they would have passed easily.  The plain fact is they are unpopular.  If the Democrats ram this through, they disregard the will of the people.</p>
<p>Lincoln said it best:  &#8220;If you want to test a man&#8217;s character, give him power.&#8221;  If the Democrats use reconciliation, their character will be on display for all to see and they will have earned the just contempt of the governed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.steubenyr.org/2010/03/just-consent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Commander Has No Clothes</title>
		<link>http://www.steubenyr.org/2010/02/the-commander-has-no-clothes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.steubenyr.org/2010/02/the-commander-has-no-clothes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 19:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steubenyr.org/?p=55</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Military service is no guarantee of competence, or of standing on the right side of history.  General George B. McClellan, appointed by Abraham Lincoln to head the Union Army, obstructed the President at every turn.  McClellan then ran against Lincoln as the Democrat party nominee in 1864. Had he won, the Confederacy would [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Military service is no guarantee of competence, or of standing on the right side of history.  General George B. McClellan, appointed by Abraham Lincoln to head the Union Army, obstructed the President at every turn.  McClellan then ran against Lincoln as the Democrat party nominee in 1864. Had he won, the Confederacy would have remained in place with slavery intact.  President Carter, a Naval Academy graduate, gutted our military, weakened us abroad and saddled us with double-digit inflation and interest rates at home.</p>
<p>Enter Rep. Eric Massa, who features his commendable military service at every opportunity.  This provides him with a veneer of moderation to obscure his liberalism.  If he were an ex-ACLU lawyer insead of an ex-Navy man, Massa&#8217;s leftism would be more apparent.</p>
<p>Consider Massa&#8217;s position on health care.  He opposed HR 3962, which was a government takeover of private insurance companies.  But he supports HR 686, a government run single-payer plan.  In a single-payer system, you pay for everybody&#8217;s health care and they pay for yours.  This is as collectivist as you can get.  Massa said, &#8220;I support the idea of a single-payer health care system in which the doctor-patient relationship remains personal and private, but costs are centrally managed.&#8221;  These are the ideas of central-planning socialists.  This country was founded on the polar opposite &#8211; principles of individual freedom and free markets.  Single-payer is not working out well in Canada.  They have 8 life-saving MRI&#8217;s per million people, to our 27.  If you need an MRI in Canada, wait in line.  The Premier of Newfoundland, Danny Williams, recently bypassed the Canadian system to have heart surgery in the U.S.</p>
<p>Massa occupies the far left in a leftist party.  We judge our leaders by their results.  In Massa&#8217;s case, the evidence is damning.  Despite all the historic evidence that government stimulus doesn&#8217;t work, he voted for it anyway, stimulating nothing but debt and unemployment.  He markets himself as an independent thinker, yet his policies foster dependency.  It&#8217;s time we see Massa clearly: a liberal in moderate&#8217;s clothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.steubenyr.org/2010/02/the-commander-has-no-clothes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who is Our Congressman&#8217;s Real Constituents?</title>
		<link>http://www.steubenyr.org/2010/02/who-is-our-congressmans-real-constituents/</link>
		<comments>http://www.steubenyr.org/2010/02/who-is-our-congressmans-real-constituents/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 12:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steubenyr.org/?p=54</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You may have missed some of these stories in the news.  That&#8217;s because our local news hasn&#8217;t covered them.  Several events recently have lead us to question who Eric Massa&#8217;s real constituents are.

December 19th Eric Massa was just getting out of Washington DC for Christmas break.  He couldn&#8217;t break quite yet, because [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may have missed some of these stories in the news.  That&#8217;s because our local news hasn&#8217;t covered them.  Several events recently have lead us to question who Eric Massa&#8217;s real constituents are.
<div></div>
<div>December 19th Eric Massa was just getting out of Washington DC for Christmas break.  He couldn&#8217;t break quite yet, because work was still on his mind.  The Congressman had to continue his fight for Single Payer healthcare.  Where was he doing this fight?  Corning? Olean?  Rochester?  No, <a href="http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2009/12/19/18633170.php">San Francisco, California</a>.  Well you know, because there are so many constituents there.  While there he talked about picking up Ted Kennedy&#8217;s mantle with the government run healthcare debate.</div>
<div></div>
<div>January 4th our Congressman turned his focus on the Marcellus shale.  Even though other states like Pennsylvania have developed reasonable safeguards and started developing this vital resource, Massa would prefer to stop this development.  Where did this debate take place?  <a href="http://www.prleap.com/pr/145846/">New York City</a>.  No constituents there?  You&#8217;re right.</div>
<div></div>
<div>Lastly, the infamous Netroots Nation.  You&#8217;ve certainly seen the video where he talks about voting &#8220;<a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/weblogs/watercooler/2009/aug/16/video-rep-massa-i-will-vote-against-interests-my-d/">against the interests of his district</a>.&#8221; What you may not have asked yourself is where did this occur?  It was held in Pittsburg, PA.  He was speaking to people indicating how he resides in a &#8220;right-wing&#8221; district and he indicated he might need their help.  Netroots Nation was a conference of progressive bloggers that represent the most extreme parts of the Democrat Party.  </div>
<div></div>
<div>So, the question is if he insists on not representing our interests, if he insists on focusing so much of his most controversial talk for outside of his district, why is that?  It&#8217;s because his views are not as popular here.  He thinks you all want Government run healthcare.  He thinks you want to stop Marcellus Shale drilling.  He thinks you&#8217;ll let him continue voting without being concerned about what you think.</div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.steubenyr.org/2010/02/who-is-our-congressmans-real-constituents/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Massa: Questionable Associates and Fringe Views</title>
		<link>http://www.steubenyr.org/2010/01/massa-questionable-associates-and-fringe-views/</link>
		<comments>http://www.steubenyr.org/2010/01/massa-questionable-associates-and-fringe-views/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 18:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steubenyr.org/?p=53</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Joe Dunning puts out a column in the Corning Leader newspaper every Sunday that is usually political in nature.  The editor has made no bones about the fact that he is a Democrat.  However, he certainly has kept an open mind in the past (which this writer hopes that he does in the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe Dunning puts out a column in the Corning Leader newspaper every Sunday that is usually political in nature.  The editor has made no bones about the fact that he is a Democrat.  However, he certainly has kept an open mind in the past (which this writer hopes that he does in the NY-29 race).  This made it quite a surprise as to the seeming anger that was expressed in his Jan. 31st, 2010 column.  His response makes me wonder if the Editor is as unbiased as he appears.  Why else would Mr. Dunning go ballistic about a press release that clearly wasn&#8217;t <a href="http://www.tomreedforcongress.com/2010/01/26/massa-cosponsors-end-of-war-resolution/">calling Massa a Communist</a>.
<div></div>
<div>The truth is, Congressman Massa&#8217;s associations and who agrees with him does tell us a lot about what kind of man he is.  First, let&#8217;s take health care.  The Congressman has made a big display of parading around the district and in front of the media saying that he won&#8217;t vote for the health care bill.  That&#8217;s because he&#8217;s for s<a href="http://massa.house.gov/index.cfm?sectionid=24&amp;parentid=23&amp;sectiontree=23,24&amp;itemid=138">ingle payer healthcare</a> (socialized medicine, government run healthcare, medicare for all, etc).  This position is even <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/46417/what-happened-to-single-payer">farther to the left than even President Obama</a> wants to go.</div>
<div></div>
<div>Secondly, his position on Afghanistan.  The Congressman has called for an immediate withdrawal from Afghanistan.  Let&#8217;s not try to capture Bin Laden.  Who cares about the instability of the country or the area?  This position also is even more <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g3dH3F4HzyM&amp;NR=1">radical than the President believes</a>.</div>
<div></div>
<div>Lastly, his associations in fundraising and in the Congress.  He has received help from Charlie Rangel and Barney Frank with fundraising at an event that was <a href="http://politicalpartytime.org/party/16222/">billed as a birthday party</a>, with an entry fee much richer than any of our birthday parties.  <a href="http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/editorials/item_TOrXOU2HLuRTqCn7vCUgfN">Mr. Rangel</a> and <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/local/longterm/tours/scandal/gobie2.htm">Mr. Frank</a> are two of the most corrupt members of Congress.</div>
<div></div>
<div>So that brings us back to the Communist comment.  It&#8217;s not that Mr. Massa is a Communist.  He may hold some socialistic viewpoints, but I don&#8217;t think that you could call him a Communist nor was that any reasonable reading of the press release. The question really is one of associations.  What does it mean when people like Mr. Rangel, Mr. Frank, and the Communist Party endorse you?  I can tell you what it CLEARLY doesn&#8217;t mean.  It doesn&#8217;t mean your views are a part of the mainstream.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.steubenyr.org/2010/01/massa-questionable-associates-and-fringe-views/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nobody Shoots Santa Claus</title>
		<link>http://www.steubenyr.org/2010/01/nobody-shoots-santa-claus/</link>
		<comments>http://www.steubenyr.org/2010/01/nobody-shoots-santa-claus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 19:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steubenyr.org/?p=51</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Franklin Delano Roosevelt (FDR) was elected in 1932 to solve America&#8217;s greatest economic crisis, the Great Depression.  In his first year he increased federal spending 83% and federal debt 73%.  Roosevelt created new federal agencies: the Civil Works Administration, the Works Progress Administration, the National Recovery Administration.  By 1934, unemployment was 22% [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Franklin Delano Roosevelt (FDR) was elected in 1932 to solve America&#8217;s greatest economic crisis, the Great Depression.  In his first year he increased federal spending 83% and federal debt 73%.  Roosevelt created new federal agencies: the Civil Works Administration, the Works Progress Administration, the National Recovery Administration.  By 1934, <a href="http://www.shmoop.com/great-depression/timeline.html">unemployment was 22%</a> and the stock market languished at just 25% of its pre-crash value.  The party in power usually loses seats in mid-term elections; in 1934, Democrat prospects looked bleak.  Yet they gained seats.  How did Roosevelt and the Democrats do it?
<div>When your economic program fails, resort to politics.  Roosevelt spent New Deal money where it helped Democrats most.  Maine was strongly Republican but held its elections in September, not November; it was used as a test case.  <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=HwTPk00QMHIC&amp;pg=PT187&amp;lpg=PT187&amp;dq=%22Maine+has+received+%24108+million+from+New+Deal+agencies.%22&amp;source=bl&amp;ots=5vzXLIaefL&amp;sig=5IQHVw5tl4OiAnGTtraMZROfYZ4&amp;hl=en&amp;ei=OSlLS_OVB4OnlAf_15SKDQ&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=book_result&amp;ct=result&amp;resnum=1&amp;ved=0CAcQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&amp;q=%22Maine%20has%20received%20%24108%20million%20from%20New%20Deal%20agencies.%22&amp;f=false">One Democrat Congressman bragged that</a> &#8220;Maine has received $108 million from New Deal agencies.&#8221;  Naval contracts flowed to Bath, Maine, while Eastport received funds for a new seawall and a bridge rebuild.  In the 1934 mid-term elections, Democrats captured two of three House seats in Maine, and nationally swept to historic victories.  The Great Depression dragged on for another six years.</div>
<div>This is relevant today.  The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, AKA the &#8220;stimulus,&#8221; is an $819 billion spending package that&#8217;s supposed to revive the economy.  The major spending is scheduled for 2010 through 2012, targeted for maximum political effect, just like the New Deal projects.</div>
<div>Government stimulus programs don&#8217;t work.  Roosevelt&#8217;s Treasury Secretary, Henry Morgenthau, Jr., told Congress in 1939:  &#8220;I say after eight years of this administration we have just as much unemployment as when we started, and we have enormous debt to boot.&#8221;  In 1940, unemployment still topped 18%.  Japan tried this in the 1990&#8217;s.  They spent lavishly on infrastructure, piling up mountains of debt.  Their economy didn&#8217;t improve; the Japanese now call the 1990&#8217;s &#8220;the lost decade.&#8221;  In 2008 the U.S. ran a budget deficit of $459 billion, or 3.2% of GDP, and still the recession accelerated.  The 2009 projected deficit is $1.4 trillion, or 13% of GDP.  When government spends, it must raise taxes or borrow, crowding out private sector investment and stifling job creation.</div>
<div>Expect Democrates to promote stimulus projects.  Former <a href="http://thinkexist.com/quotation/no_sane_local_official_who_has_hung_up_an_empty/346136.html">Governor Al Smith said</a> of Roosevelt&#8217;s spending, &#8220;Nobody shoots Santa Claus.&#8221;  He was right in one respect: people love free money.  But it&#8217;s our money.  Politicians give back what they&#8217;ve taken from us, pretending it&#8217;s a gift.  Obama and his accomplices are turning the U.S. economy into a shovel-ready project.  It&#8217;s going to take years to dig out.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.steubenyr.org/2010/01/nobody-shoots-santa-claus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
